Ahnert, Thomas. 2005. Enthusiasm and Enlightenment. Faith and Philosophy in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Modern Intellectual History 2: 153–177. Lamm, Julia A. 2005. The Art of Interpreting Plato. In The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher, ed. J. Mariña, 91–108. Cambridge. Schiavone, Michele. 1952b. Plotino nell’interpretazione dello Hegel. Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 44: 97–108. Newtonian theologian and philosopher Samuel Clarke. 6. The aftermath of the Principia II: debates with Leibniz

Catana, Leo. 2013c. The Origin of the Division between Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism. Apeiron 46.2: 31–65.Israel, Jonathan. 2001. Radical Enlightenment. Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford. Tolomio, Ilario. 1993. The Historia philosopica in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. In Models of the History of Philosophy: From Its Origins in the Renaissance to the Historia Philosophica, ed. G. Santinello, 154–160. Dordrecht.

Historia critica philosophiae a mundi incunabulis ad nostram usque aetatem deducta ( Lipsia, 1741- 1744 et 1767

1684

Heumann, Christoph August. 1715c. V. Diogenes Laertius De vitis philosophorum. Acta philosophorum 1.2: 321–367. Heumann, Christoph August. 1715b. VI. Das Leben Plotini vom Porphyrio beschrieben. Acta philosophorum 1.1: 138–159. Gerson, Lloyd P. 2010. General Introduction. In The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, ed. L. P. Gerson, 2 vols with continuous pagination, I: 1–10. Cambridge. Gerson, Lloyd P. 2014. Plotinus. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = < http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/plotinus/>. Bonetti, Aldo. 1971. Studi intorno alla filosofia di Plotino. Rivista di filosofia neo-scolastica 63: 487–511.

Ahnert, Thomas. 2006. Religion and the Origins of the German Enlightenment: Faith and the Reform of Learning in the Thought of Christian Thomasius. Rochester. Mahlev, Haim A. 2015. Philosophy of the Patriarchs?: The Agenda Behind Christoph August Heumann’s Acta Philosophorum. Journal of the History of Ideas 76.4: 517–539. Catana, Leo. 2008. The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’: Its Origin, Nature, Influence and Legitimacy. Leiden and Boston. Diderot, Denis. 1755. Eclectisme. In Encyclopedie ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des meétiers, eds D. Diderot and M. d’Alembert, vol. 5, 270–293. Paris. Pierre Gassendi, Opera omnia, 6 vols (Lyon: Laurent Anisson and Jean-Baptiste Devenet, 1658; repr. Stuttgart and Bad Cannstatt: Frommann, 1964), I, p. 7a: ‘ideo heic solum observandum, solere vulgo sectatores tanti illos ducere quorum Sectis nomina dant, ut ipsis primam Philosophiae originem acceptam ferant. Ac ne omneis recenseam, seligo dumtaxat ex Aristotelis Averroëm, qui ex Aristotelis Interpretibus Commentatoris nomen fecit suum; et ex Epicureis Lucretium, quem solum expositorem Philosophiae Epicuri habemus.’ There follows the quotation of a long passage from Averroes’s preface to the Physics (where Aristotle is presented as he who ‘invented’ and perfected physics, logic, and metaphysics), followed by the quotation of various passages from the De rerum natura, which exalt the discoveries of Epicurus. ‘Et posset quidem forte Lucretius videri Averroë excusatior,’ concludes Gassendi, ‘quod ut Philosophum, sic Poëtam agat, quem exaggeratio magis deceat; verum quomodocumque tandem Philosophiam quis profiteatur, quoniam decet illum non in hominem, sed in veritatem iurare; idcirco non possunt huiusmodi omnes exaggerationes eum non dedecere’ (p. 7b).He was born at Augsburg. He was destined for the Lutheran Church, and graduated at the University of Jena in 1718. He returned to Augsburg in 1720, but became parish minister of Kaufbeuren in 1723.