Australian guideline on management of diabetes-related foot infection: Part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease; version 1. The exhibitors will bring products and services from the world of podiatry, rehab, performance, footwear, education, business and more.

Educational standards are articulated at Levels 3, 4 and 5 of the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications (FHEQ). We received 47 public consultation responses with > 80% (strongly) agreeing that the guidelines should be approved, and ten national peak bodies endorsed the final six guidelines. L'USL Dunkerque annonce la signature de Driss Trichard" [USL Dunkerque announce the signing of Driss Trichard].The panel also clearly outlined any wording changes as compared to the source guideline’s original recommendation [ 18]. All recommendations that scored “yes” agreement in all items were able to be adopted for the Australian context.

Structures: are the nationally recommended care structures in place for the management of diabetic foot disease? The Diabetes Foot Care Profiles is produced by the National Cardiovascular Intelligence Network (NCVIN). Scores were categorised: high quality if scored > 70%, moderate if 50–69%, and low if < 50% [ 17, 23, 24]. Findings indicate that age, duration of foot drop weakness and MRC grade of foot drop prior to intervention were strong predictors of surgical outcome. Australian guideline on wound classification of diabetes-related foot ulcers: Part of the 2021 Australian evidence-based guidelines for diabetes-related foot disease; version 1.A key recommendation of the Australian DFD Strategy 2018–2022 was to ensure Australia has national DFD guidelines that continually reflect up-to-date robust evidence to guide multi-disciplinary standards of DFD care [ 1, 2]. We screened 182 identified records, assessed 24 full text records, and after further quality, suitability, and currency assessment, one record was deemed a suitable international guideline, the International Working Group Diabetic Foot Guidelines (IWGDF guidelines). Regardless of the panel’s decision to adopt, adapt, or exclude the recommendation, the panel drafted transparent reason sections to support their decisions for each recommendation [ 18]. The standards are threshold and set out what a newly qualified practitioner can safely provide for their patients in the NHS. Foot drop is a relatively uncommon presentation of lumbar degenerative disease and there is currently a paucity of evidence on management and outcomes which is reflective of the lack of standardised treatment provided to patients.